Posted on
sharepoint site designs

Are you currently employed by a government agency and wish to modernize your IT infrastructure? Find out how relocating to Office 365 and dealing in hybrid environments might help within our free web seminar-on-demand!

Full-featured parity between classic SharePoint encounters (traditional team and publishing sites) and modern SharePoint encounters (modern team, communication, and hub sites) is constantly on the cause migration concerns for organizations of any size. Modern SharePoint sites provide exciting additional features including:

  • A clear, mobile-ready interface
  • Faster page load occasions
  • Improved list and library encounters
  • Direct integration with effective tools for example PowerApps and Microsoft Flow, plus much more

A lot of my clients have discovered that a combination of both classic and modern SharePoint encounters work nicely together. I usually make sure that we spend the correct sources developing a unified consumer experience with the proper mixture of branding to boost user adoption. Despite all this, there is a key feature missing from modern SharePoint: extensive custom branding possibilities.

In classic SharePoint encounters, branding options allow designers an array of options. The opportunity to give a custom master page and not directly make use of Microsoft’s limited capability to push new UI changes to classic encounters provides SharePoint designers and developers nearly endless charge of the SharePoint interface.

Modern encounters, however, are drastically restricted. We’re presently limited within our capability to personalize the interface, including being restricted to fundamental theming (i.e. color scheme tweaking), a custom emblem, column formatters, and SharePoint Framework webparts and extensions. Particularly, with SPFx extension application customizers, we are able to incorporate a custom header and footer. These choices are effective, but not even close to extensive.

sharepoint 2019

One of the greatest problems with mixing a vintage hybrid experience along with a modern SharePoint experience is that this insufficient custom branding abilities obtainable in modern. We’re presently restricted to get a regular look backward and forward types of sites due to the insufficient parity in branding options.

Migration scenarios highlight this difference more frequently as numerous legacy branded SharePoint sites weren’t constructed with the long run in your mind. A number of these sites use custom master pages that won’t migrate well to modern encounters.


This limitation can frequently be overcome with greenfield projects where classic encounters are intentionally made with modern in your mind. Once the limitations are known, an UI/UX expert can frequently conjure the best mixture of layout and style.

Modern encounters do supply the ability for custom headers and footers, but these elements have fixed qualities that needs to be considered. These elements are fixed towards the browser window, meaning they don’t scroll using the page. For a lot of sites, this fixed nature of headers and footers may take up valuable screen space.

So, exactly how should we move ahead while working in those constraints?

With a mix of imagination, an awareness of SharePoint’s (classic and modern) extensibility endpoints, and a balanced view as to the is useful for your business, there’s a hybrid solution for virtually any project.

A hybrid scenario typically features a SharePoint portal requirement with extensive metadata, custom page layouts, and much more charge of the UI. Classic publishing portals make complete sense for this type of requirement. Meanwhile, the communication and collaboration facets of this type of solution may live within group-enabled team sites, communication sites, and hubs.

The road of least resistance includes branding your classic site(s) much like out-of-the-box modern SharePoint encounters. What this means is:

  • No custom fonts, or at best make use of the Segoe font for your system of text
  • Full-width, liquid, responsive design
  • Straight lines and corners
  • Using Office Fabric classes

Classic SharePoint branding frequently includes complex headers, footers, and—too often—overly complex mega menus. Try to possess a simple header and footer inside your classic site that suits the current UI. Give a secondary “inner” header or fat footer with increased functionality if it is needed.

Extensively branding the current SharePoint interface outdoors of custom SPFx webparts is particularly limited. You may create these yourself, why reinvent the wheel? My close friend Bob German, someone Technology Architect at Microsoft, authored a really awesome solution for any shared header and footer across both classic and modern SharePoint Encounters. This option would be available these days on GitHub for everybody to download, personalize, and deploy.

Another free solution just released through the SharePoint Patterns and Practices (PnP) community includes the SP Starter Package. This project supplies a modern as they are solution which includes personalization scenarios for contemporary team, communication, and hub sites.

Even though this project presently doesn’t include classic encounters, free projects like these give a grounds for everybody to produce hybrid solutions using practices created by subject talent inside the Office 365 ecosystem.

Watching the city deliver many project needs is definitely a pleasure to witness, like a custom project according to free components is frequently more maintainable within the lengthy term due to the large community base.


The current SharePoint interface is constantly on the evolve and improve. I probably have that lots of the characteristics we like in classic SharePoint customizations continuously make their distance to the current SharePoint UI extensibility endpoints. Meanwhile, a hybrid approach of classic and modern SharePoint encounters could be the answer for your forthcoming project, whether it’s a migration or perhaps a completely new solution.

What exactly are your encounters? Has hybrid labored for you personally? What is your opinion is the greatest path forward? Keep your discussion going.

Like that which you read? Make sure to sign up for our blog for lots of fresh content