This is actually the third excerpt from AIIM’s March survey. You’ll find another three below:
Captured, AIIM contacted over 250 people of organizations across disciplines to discover how their digital transformation journeys were going. Continue studying for any sample of AIIM’s findings on content migration and integration, and get more information at the entire report.
Content migration and content integration aren’t always mutually exclusive–most organizations trying to modernize employ some combination–but they are different.
When considering a content migration project, most organizations normally have both a “from” along with a “to” in your mind. Organizations have four primary causes of content that they would like to escape from:
- Departmental shared drives
- Business shared drives
- Individual shared drives, and
- On-premises SharePoint repositories.
Based on the data below, they’re trying to move the information INTO:
- Cloud-based content services platforms
- On-premises ECM platforms, and
- Cloud-based Office 365 and SharePoint repositories.
A vital goal in almost any migration project would be to avoid business disruption. 61% agree that “avoiding a large bang migration” is a vital priority, and 57% “don’t create a among data migration and content migration.”
Content integration seeks to prevent a few of the disruptive challenges connected with migration using a platform to gain access to and manage content without moving it. Challenging in undertaking a content integration project would be that the term continues to be not well-understood by organizations. 44% of organizations agree that “content integration” is well-understood within their organization, while 31% disagree.
While you will find myriad causes of undertaking a content integration project, two helpful questions you should ask are:
- How prevalent is knowing from the term “content integration?” and
- Exactly what do users see as the most crucial reason behind undertaking this kind of initiative?