AvePoint makes its stance on security and privacy noted for years we would like simply to propel the privacy community forward. Despite all the contributions that we’ve designed to security and privacy through the years, we’ve never once patented anything in this subject.
Regrettably, you will find indeed organizations that make an effort to claim exclusivity by filing patents on unprotectable and patent-ineligible ideas. Continue reading to find out how AvePoint lately defended our tech and also the privacy community in one such company, OneTrust.
What Went Down and Why Did We Fight It?
We’d labored difficult to develop a kind of privacy technology together with the Worldwide Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) in the past. We did this free of charge to assist them to directionally understand and implement certain privacy measures inside their particular clients’ organizations. Despite the fact that we labored carefully using the IAPP, we produced these power tools to maintain the privacy community in particular. Not every information mill experts in privacy. The reason ended up being to give others a useful help guide to reference.
Years after our software had joined the general public domain and been distributed free of charge, OneTrust filed a patent claiming they owned the fundamental methodology for the way our guides were utilised and developed. Their apparent intention ended up being to charge the privacy community for each time someone used helpful information-type methodology, that was something already well-known within the field according to our effort and also the efforts of others within our industry.
We wound up challenging that patent because we believed we’ve got the technology ought to be employed for the advantage of the whole privacy community, not merely one corporation. We believed, amongst other things, that OneTrust’s patent covered a patent-ineligible abstract indisputable fact that belonged to the community in general. It was not something which could or must have been patented to begin with. Because the pioneers in this subject, we would have liked to help keep it “open-source.”
The Finish Result
Thus, we began the price, time, and energy to challenge OneTrust’s claim. We challenged their patent for the reason it covered an abstract principle, it had become apparent, and that it hadn’t been the following stage of evolution. After roughly eight several weeks of review, the U . s . States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) agreed around and invalidated the patent.
We have seen this like a victory not only for AvePoint, as well as the entire privacy community. One company will not be permitted to patent something which should clearly most probably for everybody to make use of.
How AvePoint Examines Patenting IP
You will find companies entirely designed around attempting to file as numerous patents as you possibly can to allow them to charge people for implementing them. No matter when they aren’t the very first ones to build up something if it is to take, they’ll go.
Basically we do not have anything against earning money, we don’t think it ought to come at the expense of evolving privacy. At AvePoint, we don’t patent our operate in the privacy arena. We create lots of software that people can make money from, so rather, our total goal may be the growth of privacy and finding ways where we are able to assist the community grow.
By permitting methodologies such as the ones we produced to become available to the general public, hopefully to permit others to get more acquainted with privacy and much more educated regarding how to secure their organizations.
Obviously, there isn’t any question when companies think that they’ve developed something unique, non-apparent, and it is not a next thing or even the next evolution of existing tech, they will be able to reap the fruits of time, energy, and investment. There’s only a problem when organizations attempt to take unprotectable and patent-ineligible ideas his or her own and box the market.
We continuously examine both patents themselves and individuals who are attempting to file patents within the privacy space to find out if they’re legitimate or maybe they’re simply attempting to box the growth of privacy. We’ll still look available on the market to make sure others don’t do that, which we’re evolving the way forward for the privacy space.