These questions were initially requested by attendees in our web seminar “7 Crucial Office 365 Ways Of Contain Sprawl And Data Safe.” Click to look at on-demand.
Microsoft Teams’ rapid increase in recognition leaves an abundance of questions from folks thinking about moving to/getting the most from the woking platform. Today we’re going to talk about 6 faq’s users have concerning the features and abilities Teams offers. Let’s dive in!
1. How can you govern third-party apps in Microsoft Teams?
There’s a couple of options in Microsoft Teams for governing third-party apps. Except for “Cloud Storage Options” at work 365 Graphical user interface, all of these are done in the team level with changes capable of being reversed through the proprietors of every team.
AvePoint Cloud Governance allows you to definitely restrict much of your users to “Team members” while still enabling certain “owner” settings for that appropriate users. Who will get these “owner” setting enabled can be established by user qualities, security groups, along with other criteria.
2. What is the method to give a pop-up if somebody results in a Microsoft Teams site? Could this pop-up include products like relation to use agreement acknowledgment?
There’s no native feature that needs saying yes to some relation to use agreement. This is when another-party vendor like AvePoint aids in our Cloud Governance solution. You are able to arrange it to pressure users to accept conditions and terms as users create Teams, Groups, Team Sites, and SharePoint Sites. The answer won’t allow them to produce a new workspace unless of course they accept your terms.
3. What is the method to restrict an owner’s capability to convert Modern Team Sites to Teams to let it control the adoption of Teams?
Presently, there’s no means by the Graphical user interface to limit Proprietors of contemporary Teams Sites or Groups from converting the audience to some Team. PowerShell at work 365 allows you to definitely control who are able to create new Groups and Teams while using security group method supplied by Microsoft, but stopping proprietors from provisioning Teams that way isn’t feasible.
This really is another situation where AvePoint’s Cloud Governance can control how users communicate with Teams by restricting most users to being “members” of Groups and allowing your company to delegate “member” use of admin/owner features for Teams according to your company rules.
This rule could be based from the user’s role within the organization, their whereabouts, among the user qualities, a burglar group, or perhaps a custom criteria structure setup from your organization in advance.
Employing this degree of control can permit you to relax while Microsoft Teams is adopted inside the parameters you place. This can also instantly generate reports on usage and security to make sure that your company policies remain enforced.
4. Concerning the AtBot chatbot application in Microsoft Teams, does AtBot integrate with ServiceNow?
Certainly! Here’s a demo showing how AtBot can open a ServiceNow ticket without anyone’s knowledge if somebody asks an IT support question after which close check in once the bot resolves the problem (within the linked example the bot is within SharePoint, but it may be in Microsoft Teams or other web application). IT maintains the metrics (and also the credit!) from coping with trouble tickets inside a ticketing system that it’s already using. And when the bot can’t resolve the problem, it may elevate check in to some human.
That’s one of the leading advantages of Flow, the logic engine behind AtBot you will find Flow connectors for several IT service desk tools available out-of-the-box, but you may also connect with almost them while using HTTP connector in Z ZZXCFlow and also the app’s API. Automate tier 1 IT support from existence!
5. When the limit of Team users is 2500, how will you come with an org-wide team for those who have greater than 2500 associates?
Based on Microsoft, organization-wide Teams are unavailable for organizations using more than 2500 employees: “currently an org-wide team is restricted to organizations with a maximum of 2,500 users.” Recommendations for structuring Teams inside a more organized fashion may include using Azure AD Dynamic Groups, adding Teams for a number of office locations, sections, departments, etc.
AvePoint’s Cloud Governance will help you build and take control of your organization-wide structure of Teams by upholding your Teams categorized and labeled. This enforces naming conventions to ensure that everybody knows the why and how of every Team’s usage.
Cloud Governance can control the lifecycles for every Team according to your company policies and the reason behind their existence. Including:
- Automatic deletion
- Archiving Teams based on your compliance rules or specified inactivity periods
- The opportunity to request to increase the existence of the Team (pending approval, obviously)
All this reduces clutter and keep your Teams organized!
6. What is the method to determine in-group naming or, for reporting, exactly what the Office 365 Group was produced with (Microsoft Teams, Planner, SharePoint, etc)?
You are able to apply naming conventions at work 365 for those who have Azure AD Premium. These may depend on static strings or user qualities, although not depending on how the audience was produced.
With AvePoint Cloud Governance, explore only control how users create Groups and Teams, but that can be done in a manner that applies business policies, security enforcement, naming conventions, and lifecycle management. You might also need use of recertification and activity reports that instantly provide insights and controls within the ongoing utilisation of the workspace.
The provisioning is performed using a simple form, and you may easily control how users access a questionnaire that instantly takes these to the required request. The hyperlink for this request might be within the org-wide waffle, a hyperlink with an intranet portal or menu, a desktop bookmark whichever strategy is easiest for the users to navigate to some simple page.